The bond market rally remains among the most significant
surprises of the year. This is especially true for the US Treasury
market, which, even if G-Zero hypothesis is valid, remains the critical global
benchmark. Fed tapering was widely expected to push up US yields. Instead,
they have fallen. The 10-year yield is off 60 bp this year,and nearly
half of that decline has been recorded over the past month. Moreover, the US
market rally has taken place amid a tick up in both core and headline measure
of consumer prices.
There are many narratives being constructed as journalist; analysts and
investors seek to explain this unexpected phenomenon. While
there are many interesting hypotheses, there is a dearth of evidence. For
example, talk of central bank purchases or lengthening maturities is possible,
but the data is simply not available to verify or falsify such claims. The
latest TIC data is for March, and foreign officials were net sellers of both
bills and bonds.
Other hypothesis, like speculators, were caught wrong-footed, and the
rally in the US Treasury market is a function of their short-covering, is simply
contradicted by the facts. Look at the recent Commitment of Traders
report for speculative positioning in the futures market. In the week
that ended May 20, the gross short speculative position in the US 10-year
Treasury futures contract rose by 26.1k contracts to 529.4k contracts (each contract has a notional value of $100k). As of late February, the gross short
position stood at 346k contracts. Their current holdings are the most
since late 2004/early 2005. Rather than reduce short positions, the bears
have sold into the rally.
For their part, the bulls see more life in the rally. They
added 10.4k contracts to lift their gross long position to 436k
contracts. This is the most since last May. Trend followers and
momentum traders have been rewarded as yields have continued to
fall.
There may be something with duration extensions. Due to the US
Treasury auctions and the quarterly refunding, uncommon for the new supply of
long-dated note and bonds to prompt industry indices (benchmarks) to lengthen duration.
Money managers who track such indices also lengthen duration. Reading
the entrails of recent auctions, some see evidence for this.
There has been some talk of investors switching from European bonds to
Treasuries recently. It is difficult to verify it, but the decline of
the euro is consistent with this. Consider that the German bunds have rallied even more than US Treasuries. This had seen the US premium over Germany
widen to 120 bp, which is the upper end that is has offered since 1990.
It has tested this level several times since mid-April and most recently on May
19.
Incorporating an international dimension is important. There is a
strong possibility of the ECB will take unorthodox action next week.
In anticipation of this, some investors bought European bonds, which, in turn,
may make US Treasuries more attractive. In addition, the Bank of England
has tried to convince investors that its rates can also be kept lower for
longer. Many in the market expect the BOJ ultimately to have to provide
more stimulus if it is going to achieve the 2% inflation target.
Another dimension is the regulatory environment. Banks are
being forced to raise capital ratios. Many banks are increasing their
sovereign bond holdings. As the month of May draws to a close, the
Federal Reserve is still buying more long terms securities than it was when
QE3+ was first announced in September 2012. This is taking place in the
context of a sharp fall in the US budget deficit.
This speaks to the relative shortage of Treasuries, but also of other
core bonds, like German bunds. Given portfolio optimiszation
strategies and the desire to have core European bonds in global portfolios,
there are not a sufficient amount of German bunds. This forces some large
pools of capital, including central banks, to by French bonds as reasonable
facsimiles (with the understanding that France, despite it economic and
political challenges, remains at the core).
Back in the mid-noughts, Fed Chairman Greenspan identified a
conundrum: Why are US bond yields falling even though the Federal Reserve
was raising short-term rates? There were various answers
provided, but ultimately none proved very satisfying. Bernanke, as a Fed governor,
suggested, that it was due to surplus savings from Asia and the oil exporters,
who did not have the capacity to absorb their own savings. We now know
that European investors were also large buyers of US long-term
assets.
The doom-and-gloom camp warned that QE was going to spark an inflation
crisis. It has not. Many of the same people argued that the Fed
was the only buyer of Treasuries. No one else would buy them. This
too has proved wide of the mark. Evidence for most explanations
seems to be sorely lacking, and there are likely to be more than one
cause. Many have cited activity by central banks and sovereign wealth
funds, which seem all too often as the go-to-explanation. We would place
emphasis on private sector participants and technical and regulatory issues in
the context of the Fed and BOJ's ongoing significant purchases and anticipation
of ECB action.
Thoughts on the Bond Market Conundrum
Reviewed by Marc Chandler
on
May 29, 2014
Rating: