China's Premier Zhou Enlai was asked in
1972 about the political consequence of the French Revolution, and he famously
quipped it was too early to say. Even if, as historians recognize, Zhou was
referring to the unrest in 1968 rather than the 1789-1799 revolution, it offers
insight that is too valuable to let the facts distort.
Indeed, that insight
offers good counsel now. While there is no substitute for
prudent and disciplined risk management, we should avoid jumping to hasty
conclusions drawn from the volatile price action.
Markets are incredible aggregators of
information. They are also anticipatory by their very
nature. However, they do not always anticipate correctly, they often overshoot,
and can transition quickly from a small gradual
adjustment to a lurch, with little if any warning.
Markets are prone to exaggeration. Many participants appear to believe
that the 2.8% decline in the yuan is some
kind of watershed for the world economy.
It, more than any other factor, has been blamed for the large sell-off in
global equities. To wit Bloomberg: " More than $3.3 trillion
has been erased from the value of global
equities after China’s decision to devalue its currency spurred a wave of
selling across emerging markets."
The yuan has fallen 2.8% since the announcement on August 11, and that was recorded mostly in the first couple of sessions. Last week, as the stock market
tumbled, the yuan traded sideways, and if anything, firmed slightly. The
magnitude of the yuan's decline is too small to have much impact on Chinese
exports. This, of course, can
change going forward, but there is no reason to think that it is particularly
likely. The IMF and the US embrace
what PBOC said it is going to do. Their
caution is prompted by concerns that China will not enthusiastically implement
its verbal declarations.
Consider other currency moves since August
10. The
Japanese yen has appreciated by 2.1%, the euro by 3.3%, the Swiss franc by 3.9%
and the Swedish krona by 4.0%. The South Korean won fell 2.6%. Economists
recognize these movements as too small to impact growth or competitiveness.
Some observers and reporters claim that
Vietnam's currency depreciation, and the decision to float (sink) Kazakhstan's
tenge was a consequence of China's currency move. It is
asserted as a fact, but there is
no evidence. The media does not quote officials from either country
explaining such motivation.
Vietnam depreciated the dong twice before China's move. The only connection with China's
currency move is that it took place prior to the third move by Vietnam. The larger concern for Vietnam may be the
slowing of Chinese growth not the 2.8% decline in the yuan. This more
than the currency explains the decline in Chinese auto sales, cell phone
purchases and luxury goods consumption.
Kazakhstan is Asia's largest oil exporter. The share of commodities of its exports is one of the
highest in the world; nearly 90%. Oil accounts for a little more of its Kazakhstan exports. It had a rigid
currency regime. It has been under chronic pressure even before the
collapse in oil prices. It had devalued by nearly 20% in early 2014.
A more compelling narrative of Kazakhstan decision to float its currency
links it to the rigidity of its regime in the face of incredibly powerful terms
of trade shock. The drop of oil cannot be directly attributed to China. The most
recent trade data show that the economic slowdown has not weakened China's
demand for oil. Kazakhstan Prime Minister, Massimov, linked his decision to oil prices, not to China.
The terms of trade shock went more through
Russia than China. Most of the country's imports come
from Russia. The depreciation of the ruble cheapens the price of such
imports. The ruble has depreciated 9% since China devalued.
Unlike Kazakhstan, China's devaluation was
self-imposed. China chose to weaken the currency.
It was not forced upon it.
Many of the (currency) war camp focus
on the depreciation. Instead, the (potentially, if operationalized) more
important aspect of its decision was in letting market forces steer the yuan.
Chinese officials have recognized the need for greater financial
reforms. The pressure is both
internal and external.
The IMF's recent staff paper recognized
the immense progress that China has achieved
over the past several years. However, it argued that more efforts
are needed if the yuan is going to be
part of the SDR. Investors learned last week that the IMF board accepted
the staff recommendation top delay the implementation to 1 October 2016 any
decision that the board takes on the yuan later
this year. In addition to making the
currency regime more flexible, at least on paper, it also can better generate a
real market price that is operationally necessary for setting the SDR prices,
which was not produced by the former regime.
The timing of the PBOC
move may have been linked not only to the IMF decision but also to next month's
FOMC meeting, at which 82% of economist expect the first rate increase since
2006, or at least they did earlier this month (Wall
Street Journal survey). Efforts to close the gap between the
fix and spot prices, one of the declared goals of the new regime, would
probably have been more arduous if the Fed were to raise rates first.
Because China allowed a small depreciation
of the yuan, making it not weak but less strong
(against most other currencies), many argue that it precludes a Fed hike. The Fed keeps its own counsel. Policy is not necessarily set
as the IMF wishes. It is surely not set in Beijing. While it is
perfectly reasonable that financial conditions are
broadly taken into account in the setting of monetary policy, monetary
policy cannot be a slave to the VIX either.
Just like the Fed has
noted that expectations for higher rates in the US have helped strengthen the
dollar, it may have also left equity market, where Yellen has acknowledged
elevated valuation, vulnerable to a setback. The fact that it was in such a tight
range prevailed for so long. The duration of such a narrow range is rarer than
the S&P 500 falling nearly four standard deviations away from its 20-day
moving average.
The key to stabilizing the markets may not
lie with data. The more significant unknown is not
that investors lack a strong handle on
the state of various economies. The
most important missing piece is the intent of policy makers. What is
China thinking? Are officials panicking? What is the Federal
Reserve thinking? Can it go against
what the market is telling it via bond yields and break-evens?
In the US, the most important news then
may not be the upward revision in Q2 GDP to 3.2% from 2.3%, according to the
Bloomberg consensus. It may not be the durable goods
orders report, where a sharp drop in aircraft orders will depress the headline.
Personal consumption, a wider category than retail sales, is expected to
rise 0.4%, which would match the three-month average. A 0.1% rise in the
core PCE deflator may be sufficient to keep the year-over-year rate steady even
if not strong at 1.2%.
While the media fanned
ideas of that the sharp drop in equity prices was a sign of fears of a global
recession, the Atlanta Fed GDPNow estimate of Q3 GDP nearly doubled from 0.7%
on August 13 to 1.3% on August 18. As more economic data is reported,
the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow model is adjusted. It is nowcasting not forecasting. The challenge for the FOMC is not
the full employment mandate but the price stability mandate. That is why
the more important even next week (August 29) is the Fed's Vice Chairman's
panel discussion at Jackson Hole on US inflation developments.
We would not look for
Fischer to break new ground, but rather to cogently explain how the Fed targets
core inflation, and why the appreciation of the dollar, and drop in commodity
prices, have a transitory impact on the general price level. The Fed attempt to focus on the
underlying signal of prices. There are lag times between the change in
monetary policy and impact on prices. It is true domestically as well as
internationally--the price of money adjusts much faster than the price of goods and services.
The breakdown of UK's GDP data helps
illustrate this point. The 0.7% quarter-over-quarter growth
reported for Q2 is subject to revision. It is expected to be unchanged,
but there is a small risk it is downgraded
slightly. The details are expected
to show that UK exports rose 2.0% in the quarter. This is
remarkable. Many countries, including Japan and South Korea that have experienced
weakening currencies, reported a decline in exports in Q2. In Q2
sterling was the strongest of the major currencies gaining 6% against the
dollar.
News from Europe will likely reinforce the
view that the best of the cyclical recovery may be behind the eurozone. The composite PMI has been going
sideways since March. Nearly every member reported weaker than expected
growth in Q2. Germany's IFO is expected to have softened, dragged down by
the weakness of the DAX, China's stock market sell-off and yuan depreciation.
Other EC confidence indicators for the region likely weakened as well.
As with the real economy so too with
monetary measures and inflation. Money supply growth has stabilized though credit growth appears to be
continuing to improve slowly. German and Spain's HICP measures of
inflation are expected to have slipped lower.
Japan's data cycle sees several important reports in the coming days. These include household spending, unemployment, and inflation. The general
sense is that the contraction in Q2 will not be repeated, but despite the BOJ's
aggressive, unorthodox easing of monetary
policy, deflation has not been defeated.
Investors should not focus on the headline
CPI figures, or even the traditional core rate, which excludes fresh food. Although
this latter measure of inflation is what the BOJ targets, it is clear from
public comments, and confirmed privately, that key officials may be more
focused on the measure that excludes food and energy (and alcohol).
That measure is expected to be unchanged at 0.6%.
Our analysis suggests that the market has
exaggerated the risk of a global recession and the competitive implication of
the depreciation of the Chinese yuan. The sharp sell-off that has pushed
the prices of almost 60% of the S&P 500 members more than 10% below their
peaks will create new opportunities. Prudence dictates waiting for a technical sign that the momentum has exhausted
itself. In particular, be on the lookout for one of a number of reversal patterns which usually
entail a sell-off followed by a strong
close.
The same is true of the dollar. The short-covering squeeze has lifted the euro and
yen. Given market positioning, there is room for additional gains.
However, these gains should be seen
as counter to the underlying, fundamentally driven trend based on the
divergence of monetary policy. This is the kind of pullback in the dollar than
many investors had wanted to create a new
opportunity to get with the trend and adjust hedges. Such participants
should await a sign from the price action itself that the short-squeeze is
over.
disclaimer
In Hasty Judgments and Exaggerations Lie Investment Opportunities
Reviewed by Marc Chandler
on
August 23, 2015
Rating: