The change in the Greek negotiating team appears to have helped
reinvigorate the talks with the official creditors. However,
insufficient progress has been made that would allow a resumption of aid
payments. Aid has been cut off since the middle of last year, six
months before Syriza's election.
The official creditors have three demands for conditions for resuming
assistance. The Greek government's proposals must be 1) fiscally
sustainable, 2) facilitate financial sector stability, and 3) not undermine
competitiveness.
The first two conditions are not problematic. The political
paralysis has weakened the economy and what was once projected to be a primary
budget surplus this year is looking like a deficit. Nevertheless, the
government seems willing to commit to a primary surplus of around half of the
previous agreement of 3%. The Syriza government also recognizes the
importance of a stronger banking sector.
The rub is the third condition: competitiveness.
The official creditors appear to think about competitiveness in terms of labor
costs. This is wages and benefits, including pensions. The Syriza
government is resisting such pressure. It argues that austerity in those
areas weaken the economy, as well as creating more social dislocation (what it
calls a humanitarian crisis). The IMF has previously indicated that it
under-estimated the fiscal multiplier--or how mush austerity impacts the economy
but seems reluctant to correct its error.
It is in this context that yesterday's parliamentary action needs to be
understood. Parliament approved the government proposals that in
effect reverse earlier public administration reform. Greece's parliament
approved plans to re-hire 13,000 civil servants. It also eliminated the
annual evaluations and merit-based promotions.
The re-hiring plans include the municipal policy force that had been
disbanded about a year and a half ago. There are also "several
thousand" caretakers at state schools that will be re-hired.
Some 600 cleaning women in Varoufakis' finance ministry will also be re-hired,
as early as next month, according to reports.
While the re-hiring signals the rejection of the past agreements with the
official creditors, the scrapping of annual evaluations and merit-based
promotions pokes a finger in their eyes. Nor was there a clear
indication on how the salaries of the re-hired workers would be
funded.
When queried about the government's plans, Interior Minister Voutsis
said, "We aren't going to consult the institutions [official creditors],
we don't have to, we're a sovereign state, " according to press reports.
Therein lies the heart of the matter. Being in a monetary
union, or even the EU itself, requires some surrendering of sovereignty.
This is what European officials mean when they say Greece is a member of a
select club, and there are certain rules that membership entails.
Greece wants its cake and eat it too. It wants maximum
sovereignty and membership in the
exclusive club. The rules are not cast in stones, but they are not
infinitely flexible either. The new twist to the plot in
recent days has been the "discovery" of a rift between the IMF and
the EU. The IMF seems more concerned with pension and labor market
reforms. The EU is thought to be concerned with the commitment to have a
primary budget surplus.
Many read the IMF's comments as adding pressure on Greece. We
demur. The IMF added pressure to the official creditors in
Europe. Because the EU has failed to stabilize Greece's debt-to-GDP
ratio, the IMF, which had over-lent to Greece in the first place, over-riding
its own rules, is reluctant to participate in giving Greece more money.
The IMF's participation in the European aid
packages was controversial in the beginning. However, ultimately, the
IMF's money, credibility, and technical skills carried the day.
Greece has large euro payment (700 mln) to the IMF due later this month.
As we have noted before missing, the payment would put it into arrears.
It would trigger standing operating procedures for such cases In 2000,
there were 27 countries that were in arrears to the IMF. By 2011, it had
fallen to three.
The IMF would suspend future payments to
Greece until its account was brought back into good standing. Yet if
the IMF were already not going to participate in new funds for Greece, the
Syriza government would not be losing much. That said, falling into
arrears to the IMF could spook other investors.
We still think that the cost of keeping Greece
in EMU, as large as that might be, is still less than the cost of forcing it
out. We expect a deal will eventually be worked out. The end of
June seems like the hard deadline, but if an agreement is not reached by early
June, it is hard to see how it can be implemented (included acceptance by
numerous parliaments) by the end of that month.
Greece Wrestles with Itself
Reviewed by Marc Chandler
on
May 06, 2015
Rating: