I was canoeing recently. When I looked that oar in the water, it
looked bent. It wasn't my equipment,
and I am a novice. I cursed to myself and quickly pulled the oar from the
water. I smiled. It was not bent.
It was an optical illusion.
There is a chart that is making the rounds. It shows the
S&P 500 moving in tandem with the Shanghai Composite. I have tried to
recreate the Great
Graphic on Bloomberg.
It does look like a good fit. but
do no be misled. The two different scales can distort what is actually taking place. Sometimes it is helpful to have two scales for
two time series. Context matters.
In this display of the data, which is used to make an argument, it
appears the moves are of the Chinese and US stocks are similar.
This is not a particularly robust
argument. It is comparing apples and oranges. To look at the data more rigorously, which as
investors we want, the two-time
series ought to be normalized. In effect both are turned into an index
and start at 100. Here is what the two-time
series really look like.
The starting point is the same--six months ago. It shows that
when the Shanghai Composite fell 25% through
late-August, the S&P 500 fell less than half as much. It shows that
the S&P 500 retested that July high in October and November while the Shanghai Composite was unable to recoup much
more than half of its decline.
More recently, while the S&p 500 has lost almost 10% from its recent
peak, the Shanghai Composite has nearly twice as much. Correlation is
one type of covariance of two-time
series. It is a quantitative relationship that cannot be eyeballed. A graph of two variables
with two scales can show nearly anything one wants. It is not very
persuasive.
It is also true that the correlation is not very stable.
Consider the 60-day rolling correlation of the value of the S&P 500 and the
value of the Shanghai Composite. This correlation measure captures the
directional co-movement of the two markets. It was above 0.87 as recently
as s mid-December. The correlation fell to almost 0.3 as of the middle of
last week.
The 30-day correlation risks too small of a sample size. The
correlation was inverse for most of December and has shot up to almost 0.75 today. From late-August
through early-October and then against in late-October and through the first
part of November, the 30-day correlation of
the level of the S&P and the level of the Shanghai Composite was above 0.8.
For investors, the correlation of the returns of both time series is more
significant. This can be found by running the correlation on the basis of percentage change. Over
the past sixty days, the correlation of the percentage change in the S&P 500
and the percentage change in the Shanghai Composite is near 0.21. It was
stable a little above 0.4% from late August through
most of November. It dipped into negative territory in early December
before rebounding last week.
Great Graphic: Shanghai Composite and the S&P 500
Reviewed by Marc Chandler
on
January 11, 2016
Rating: