Sterling fell 4.25% from the high on December 28 to yesterday.
It has been confined to yesterday's range today. After finishing
below the lower Bollinger Band yesterday, it has moved back into the band
today.
The Bank of England meets tomorrow. It is way to early to
seriously look for a change in policy. At most, MPC member McCafferty may
abandon his formal call (dissent) for an immediate rate
hike. He has done this before. We suspect if the hawk
does rejoin the majority, it has no more significance than his dissents.
Why has sterling performed so miserably? There are two main
drivers. First, the economic data has disappointed and investors have
been pushing out their expectations of the first hike. It has shifted
from late-Q2 to late-Q4. Second, there is concern about a referendum on
EU membership that could be held in May.
The UK has a full economic calendar next week. Inflation,
employment and retail sales are the main features. The risk is for
continued soft data. However, the market appears to have largely adjusted
to the slower growth profile that the recent string of data indicated. On
New Year's Eve, the December 16 short-sterling futures contract implied a
3-month yield in 12-months’ time of 104 bp. Yesterday it made contract
highs to imply a 74 bp yield.
The March contract implied a yield of 64 bp at the end of last year and
60 bp at close yesterday. The spread between the two contracts fell to 16
bp yesterday. Barring the pricing in of a rate cut, we suspect there is
not much more scope for spread compression. Combined with our
technical analysis, we suspect that the decline in short-term UK rates is
nearly at an end.
The US two-year premium over the UK peaked at 46 bp on December 29.
This is the largest US premium since 2000, when it peaked just below 50
bp. Thus far this year, the spread has moved sideways. It is at 42
bp now
If the first leg of the sterling bear case may have nearly run its course,
what about the other leg, the referendum? The news stream
is likely to improve in the coming weeks. Note that the predictive
markets (where people can wager on event outcomes) expect UK voters to approve
remaining in the EU 3:1.
The key event is the EU Council meeting February 18-19.
Negotiations are expected to be wrapped up then. Contacts report that the
EU is likely to make most of the concessions UK Prime Minister Cameron is
seeking. There even seems to be a compromise in the works about work-related
benefits to EU workers who move to UK. In the lead up to the
meeting, we expect more supportive comments and guidance that may ease anxiety
about a Brexit.
To be sure, there is no reversal pattern in sterling. There are
no divergences in the RSI or MACDs. No downtrend line has been
violated. Nevertheless, we suspect that the rubber band has been
stretched and is nearly ready to snap back.
Sterling has fallen in nine of the last eleven sessions coming into today.
Speculators in the futures markets had reduced their gross short sterling
exposure to its lowest level last year in late-September at 43.7k
contract. In early November, the gross short position was still small at
45.8k contracts. It stood at 56.3k contracts in the middle of December
and 75.2k as of January 5. This is a six-month high.
There is a risk then for a near-term short-squeeze, which may follow
tomorrow's BOE meeting. There are two levels to watch indicate that
such a short-squeeze, which again, the technical evidence remains
elusive. First is the five day moving average. It is near $1.4515
today. Sterling has not closed above this average since December 28, when
the latest leg down began. The other level is about a cent higher.
It corresponds to a down trendline drawn off the December 14 high and
corresponds to some congestion from the end of last week and the start of this
week.
This is not a recommendation to buy sterling. Discipline
requires waiting for evidence that one trying to catch a falling knife.
This is a warning that we may get such evidence shortly. Be
prepared. Have a strategy. Stick to it.
Disclaimer
Is Sterling almost Done Being Pounded?
Reviewed by Marc Chandler
on
January 13, 2016
Rating: