Whatever force had gripped the global capital markets since the
start of the year has been broken. This simple characterization is
rich. It is not clear if or what macroeconomic considerations were
driving the markets.
The markets had taken the unsurprising Fed rate hike in mid-December in stride. The dramatic moves in the market did not begin until this year. Some have suggested China was at the crux of it, but the global impact seemed out of proportion.
Others suggested it was the collapse in oil prices, but that too seemed as much a cause as effect. Investors were well aware of the likelihood that Iranian oil would hit the markets, and some of the sell-off late last year was thought to reflect this anticipation.
The markets had taken the unsurprising Fed rate hike in mid-December in stride. The dramatic moves in the market did not begin until this year. Some have suggested China was at the crux of it, but the global impact seemed out of proportion.
Others suggested it was the collapse in oil prices, but that too seemed as much a cause as effect. Investors were well aware of the likelihood that Iranian oil would hit the markets, and some of the sell-off late last year was thought to reflect this anticipation.
Blanchard,
formerly of the top economist at the IMF, opined that the sharp market moves
were the result of "herding."
One sold because
others were selling. That strikes us as under-appreciating risk and
money management challenges. Nevertheless, it is instructive because it
suggests the answer may not be found in
the macro-narratives, but in the micro-market structure. By the time
most returned from their New Year's holiday, the markets were already swooning. The Nikkei, DAX
and S&P 500 gapped lower in the very first session of the year.
With scar
tissue from the summer swoon still fresh, many buyers remained on the
sidelines. There were a couple of failed attempts to
bottom, but the selling pressure did not exhaust itself until the middle of
last week. Strong rallies in
commodities, many emerging markets, and dollar-bloc currencies were seen.
Part of this was surely short-covering by
momentum traders, and in the emerging market space, it is expensive to be short
currencies, such as the Brazilian real or South African rand, given the interest rate differentials, with downside
momentum. However, anecdotal reports suggest some value investors may have trickled in while some asset managers may have begun
putting some of their high cash levels to work.
The week ahead
features three major central banks, the Fed, the BOJ, and the RBNZ. We do not expect fresh
action from any, but we concede that a rate cut by the central bank of New
Zealand would be the least surprising. It is already in an easing mode.
Last week, a 0.5% decline in Q4 CPI was reported. It was twice the decline that market
expected and brought the year-over-year
rate to 0.1% from 0.4% in Q3. Falling milk prices are an additional
headwind. We suspect officials prefer to avoid policy changes given
market conditions, and the 6.5% decline of the New Zealand dollar on a
trade-weighted basis since the start of the year buys some time.
This is not a
live meeting for the Federal Reserve in the sense no change in policy can be reasonably expected. Whatever the Fed means by gradual,
it does not mean a rate hike at
consecutive meetings. On top of that recent developments can only
renew the concerns expressed last September when the Fed opted not to hike rates.
Since the FOMC
met last month, it has become more evident that the US economy nearly stagnated
in Q4. When the Fed
met last month, the Atlanta Fed GDPNowcast suggested economy was tracking
around 2.0% annualized growth in Q4, which is about what is regarded as trend. The Atlanta Fed's
model now say around 0.7% annualized. The FOMC will not have Q4 GDP in
hand when it meets. It will be reported
at the end of the week, but they will
know as investors do, that it was poor.
In addition,
market-based measures of inflation, such as difference between the yields of
conventional and inflation-protected bonds. The 10-year break-even fell to its
lowest level since 2009, some 30 bp lower than where it finished last year.
The University of Michigan will update its survey of inflation
expectations. The one-year fell to 2.4%, its lowest in since September
2010 in the preliminary reading. However, the longer-term (5-10 years) expectations have firmed since
2.5% seen in October. And at 2.7%, it matches the 12- and 24-month
averages.
The Federal Reserve may draw some comfort from only employment report since
last month's meeting. The nearly 300k net increase in
nonfarm payrolls was the second best of the year. Fed officials will
likely recognize, as many private sector economists do, that such job growth
will be difficult to sustain as full employment has been approached.
Not only may
there be some payback in January for the large
increase jobs in December, but initial
jobless claims have been rising. Seemingly unnoticed by many, the
four-week moving average, used to smooth out the volatility of this
high-frequency report, has risen to 285k,
last seen in eight months ago.
At the same
time, investors need to be cognizant of two things. First, despite the rising dollar and
falling oil prices, core CPI trended higher last year to reach 2.1%, the
highest since mid-2012. Second, market expectations for March could not get
much lower. Consider that Fed funds have been averaging a little below
the middle of its 25-50 bp range. The March contract implies an average
rate 40 bp.
The Bank of
Japan is in a different position. It is aggressively expanding its
balance sheet, which includes buying, among other things, ETFs. At last
week's lows, the Nikkei was 20% off the high from early-December. The yen
appreciated by more about 4.5% over the
same period.
The economic
performance leaves much to be desired. The BOJ estimates trend growth to be
around 0.5%. Normal economic variability means that negative prints will
be common. The economy expanded
(0.3% quarter-over-quarter) in Q3 after contracting 0.1% in Q2. It look
like it contracted slightly in Q4.
The BOJ insists
that it is making progress in lifting inflation. Although it targets the rate excluding
only fresh food, BOJ officials have been guiding investors to focus on the
metric that does not include energy as well. The BOJ's two-day meeting
will conclude the day after the December CPI figures are published. The key measure is expected to be unchanged at
0.9%. It has been trending higher since reaching 0.4% last April and May.
There has been talk in recent days that the BOJ may
extend what it calls Qualitative and Quantitative Easing, but we demur. Instead, we suggest the key issue for investors will
be the BOJ's inflation forecasts. There are two elements to note.
First is the
inflation forecast for the fiscal year that begins 1 April. It is
currently set at 1.4%. Trimming it is not significant, but pushing
it below 1% would be important. It
would increase the likelihood of more action, perhaps as early as April.
The second
element is the forecast for FY2017. It currently stands at 1.8%.
The BOJ's target is 2%. A cut in this would signal fading confidence of
reaching the target. That too could
signal the likelihood of additional
measures.
Like other
central banks, the BOJ wants to signal
that it monitoring developments but does not want
to feed investors anxiety by panicking. It will likely find some solace in
the fact that in the second half of last week, the yen surrendered half of the
gains recorded on a trade-weighted basis since the start of the year. It still remains nearly 4.75% above the
early-December low. We note, though that it was government officials and
not the BOJ who signaled their discomfort with the strength of the yen last
week.
Investors will
continue to monitor developments closely
in China. The
central bank is injected large sums of liquidity into the market, ostensibly
ahead of the New Year holiday in early February. Through overt action, and
possibly covert as well, Chinese
officials have, at least temporarily succeeded in stabilizing both the onshore
and offshore yuan. This helped it,
least tentatively, to keep the spread
between the two at relatively low levels. The Shanghai Composite
looks poised to bounce from a technical perspective. It finished last
week near 2915. A move above 3000 would be
constructive.
There will be interest in the Q4 GDP reports of several
European countries including the UK, France, and Spain. UK and French growth may slowed slightly while Spain continued to motor ahead
(0.8% quarter-over-quarter). Spain is expected to slow this year.
It political drama reached new proportions before the weekend when former
Prime Minister Rajoy refused the offer to try to form a government, signaling
he lacks a majority. This puts
pressure on Socialists who may need Podemos to form a government but does not
want to accept its apparent demand for a referendum for Catalonia's
independence.
The eurozone's
preliminary estimate of January CPI will be released. It is inconsequential, even if it
rises to 0.3%. The March ECB meeting is clearly in play following
Draghi's press conference last week. The prospect of at least another
deposit rate cut and the possibility of
more bond purchases will likely deter a
sustained move higher by the euro in the intervening period.
Disclaimer
Week Ahead: Picking Up the Pieces
Reviewed by Marc Chandler
on
January 24, 2016
Rating: