The Chair of the Federal Reserve testifies
before Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday. Given the recent FOMC meeting and
Yellen's press conference, it is unlikely new ground will be broken. It is
difficult for the market to price out a July hike more than it already has
done.
The August Fed funds futures contract,
which offers the clearest read on the July 26-27 FOMC meeting, has two of a
possible 25 bp hike (which is the same as a 12.5% chance). It is still early in the month, and
there is not much data for this month. What data there is has not been
particularly encouraging. Weekly jobless claims are relatively elevated.
The Philly Fed June survey showed deterioration of the labor market and
the Empire State manufacturing survey's diffusion index was at zero, suggesting
that the number of firms increasing and decreasing their workforces was the
same.
Instead of US-centric drivers, the week
ahead is the most important of the year and dominated by events in Europe. Of course, the UK referendum
on June 23 is the big event that has sent ripples through the global capital
markets. It is still not clear how the murder of UK MP Jo Cox is going to
impact the vote. The first poll fully conducted after Cox's death found a
shift toward remaining in the EU.
The Survation telephone poll on June 18-19
for the Mail found 45% favor remain and 42% want to leave. This is a reversal of Survation's
previous poll. Separately, a YouGov poll for the Sunday Times of which a
2/3 was conducted after Cox's assassination, showed 44% want to remain part of
the EU and 43% want to leave.
The betting has edged in favor or remain
and so have the event markets. The bookmakers have widened the odds
of Brexit. At the peak last week, one had to wager 47 cents (to win $1)
at PredictIt for Brexit. Now an exit wager can be made for 36 cents.
Regardless of the outcome, participant
must be prepared for a dramatic reaction in the markets. In the futures market, the net
speculative positioning has changed very little over the last couple of weeks
(short almost 37k futures contracts), but the size of the gross long and short
positions have increased by roughly 30k contracts since the end of last month.
There are nearly 400 local vote counting
centers. The
polls are open until 10:00 BST (5 pm EST). Although early market reaction is
often faded, what may not be widely realized, but some large pools of capital
are believed to be paying for their own private exit polls. This is
important. This private information gives an obvious edge. A sense
of the official results, even if not 100%, will likely be known between 3-5 am
BST, which is late-Thursday night in NY, where many market participants
are expected to be manning their phones/computers. It is
understood that the central banks will provide extra liquidity for the markets
as needed.
It is not clear that a vote to remain in
the EU will avoid a political crisis in the UK. The Tory Party has been torn
asunder. The future of UKIP is not clear. The Labour Party is not
in a particularly strong position to push for advantage.
Many think that a UK vote to leave could
precipitate a broader crisis in the EU, and especially EMU. European leaders are cognizant of this and
some sort of new initiative could be forthcoming. Some more integrated security
and defense area activities are perhaps relatively low hanging political fruit.
There seems to be less recognition that the EU will negotiate any divorce under
the harshest of terms to avoid the dissolution of other marriages. What
some said of Grexit would by political necessity (and not because of a particular
personality) is applicable for Brexit.
It is important to keep in mind that the
UK is a member of the WTO, which comes with reciprocal rights and
responsibilities. However,
the WTO is not comprehensive. It is stronger on trade in goods, for which
the UK runs a trade deficit. It is weaker, and therefore the trade is
more vulnerable, on services, which the UK runs a surplus. The UK remains
a member of the United Nations, and has a veto in the Security Council.
However, many other agreements that the UK is engaged are a function of
being the in European Union.
The optimists talk about a two-year
negotiating process. The
pessimists warn of a much longer process. In any event, Brexit would not
necessarily trigger an immediate drop in economic activity as some of the
scar-tactic claimed. Rather it would likely be more like a debilitating
illness. It would impact decisions about the future, like staffing,
investment, expansion, etc. However, the market for capital adjusts quicker,
and, of course, can have an impact on the real economy.
Reports indicate, for example, in the week
ending June 15, $1.1 bln of UK equities were liquidated by global investors,
which is the second highest weekly outflow recorded. It was the eighth
week of net sales. Lipper estimates that the assets under management of
the UK fund industry has fallen by a GBP200 bln to GBP900 bln over the past
twelve months. Outflows from the equities have been recorded in eight of
the past nine months, while outflows from UK strategic bond funds has not
missed a month. Apparently, some of savings have been drawn to the
absolute return funds. Under what conditions will they return? It
suggests that volatility will likely remain elevated for a bit longer, even if
not as high as seen recently.
Two days before the UK referendum, on June
21 the German Constitutional Court will hand down its decision on whether the
Bundesbank's participation in the ECB's Outright Market Transactions would
violate the German constitution. The European Court of Justice, who the German court
initially deferred issues of whether OMT violates EU law or the ECB's mandate,
ruled in the central bank's favor.
Although OMT has been largely superseded
by QE, if the German Court finds that it violates German law, it could trigger
a crisis. Such
a decision would expose a fundamental contradiction between German law and EU
law. It would reinvigorate efforts to challenge the (German)
constitutionality of QE's sovereign and corporate bond purchases.
Without putting too fine of a point on it, such a decision would open a can of
worms which could very well overwhelm the capabilities of the current political
leadership given their respective domestic challenges.
We brought this to your attention before the
weekend. It does not appear on many economic calendars. There may be only a low
probability that the German court reads the German constitution in such a way
that challenges what Germany and the Bundesbank can do in the EU in such a
direct way. However, it is precisely these kind of low probability high
risk events that investors need to be aware.
As the UK goes to the polls, the eurozone
will report flash June PMI readings. The ECB has acknowledged, and market economists
appear to agree, the eurozone economy is slowing from the heady 0.6%
growth in Q1. Growth in Q2 looks to be closer to 0.4%, which for the euro
area is close to trend growth. The periphery appears to be slowing more
than the core. This means that the risk is for the final PMI to be lower
than the flash reading.
As the markets respond on June 24 to the
results of the UK referendum, the ECB will announced the results of the first leg of
its second round to Targeted Long-Term Repo Operations. The key issue is the size of
the take-down or participation. However, the challenge will be to
separate the new demand from the rolling over of existing borrowings under
previous TLTRO programs. There is an estimated 423 bln euros of
outstanding TLTRO borrowings.
The real new demand is expected to be
minimal, even if the headline is in the 300-400 bln euro range. At first TLTRO is September 2014, 82 bln euros was borrowed,
a small fraction of what was on tap. The issue behind the weak lending
figures in the eurozone is not that rates are high or that the banks lack
sufficient funds or proper incentives. To the extent that demand is
sluggish, more and cheaper funds are not the solution.
The success of the program cannot be
simply measured by the amount of new funds provided. The ECB says that its evaluation will
focus on improvement of financial conditions, not on size. The TLTRO
program can serve a backstop for banks, insuring that sufficient funds are
available if needed. In addition, for those banks that doe participate, the
possibility of securing funds as cheap as minus 40 bp compensates the banks for the
charge on extra reserves. Peripheral banks, especially in Italy and
Spain, are expected to be the biggest participants.
Lastly we note that global investors will
likely to express their disappointment with news over the weekend that the
Governor of India's central bank Rajan will step down at the end of his term in
early September. There
have been indications over the last couple of weeks that Rajan might do this,
and it has weighed on the currency and bonds. Rajan's tight monetary
policy has come under criticism of some key government officials. There
also have been reports of Rajan's desire to leave and return to academia.
Since the start of June when such reports
began circulating, the rupee's 0.25% gain is among the least in emerging
markets. It is
better than only the pegged Hong Kong dollar (0.15%), the Chinese yuan
(-0.02%), and the Mexican peso (-2%). Indian stocks have fared alright
in the sense that they are little changed, while the MSCI Asia Pacific Index is
off nearly 1.5% so far this month and the MSCI Emerging Market equity index is
off around 0.25%. India's benchmark 10-year bond yield has risen three
basis points this month, while most yields are lower.
Disclaimer
The Week Ahead is All about Europe
Reviewed by Marc Chandler
on
June 19, 2016
Rating: