One
of the most significant market responses to Russia's attack on Ukraine is in
the expectations for the trajectory of monetary policy in many of the
high-income countries, including the US, eurozone, UK and Canada. The market has abandoned speculation of a
50 bp hike in mid-March by the FOMC and the Bank of England. It has also scaled back the ECB's move to 20 bp this year from 50 bp. Even after the Russian invasion,
the market had discounted a 75% chance that the Bank of Canada would hike by 50
bp. But, by the time the BoC met last week, the market had correctly
anticipated only a 25 bp hike would be delivered.
The US warned on February 11
that Russia could attack Ukraine at any moment. The day before that warning
the Fed funds futures strip implied a little more than an 80% chance of a 50 bp
hike and about 162.5 bp of tightening this year. Now, the December
Fed funds futures has 150 bp of tightening discounted this year. The
two-year yield reached a high of almost 1.64% on February 10. Last week,
the yield briefly slipped below 1.26%, its lowest level since February 4, but
finished a little above 1.50%. The US 10-year yield had traded above the
2% threshold on February 25. It gapped lower last Monday and fell to
almost 1.68% on March 1, the lowest since January 24, before rebounding to the
1.90% area. The US 2-10 curve has flattened sharply from this year's
peak near 90 bp on January 7 and slipped below 30 bp on March 3.
A similar development has
been seen in the UK.
On the eve of the US warning, the market had slightly more than a 60% chance that the BOE would hike 50 bp on March 17. The has been considerably
unwound. At the end of last week, it had been downgraded to about a 20%
chance. The 2-year yield peaked on February 16 just shy of
1.55%. At the low point last week, it slipped below 0.80% but finished the
week at about 1.05%. The 10-year Gilt inched above 1.60% the
same day the two-year yield peaked. It gapped lower on March 1 and
briefly traded below 1.10% before rebounding to finish the week near 1.20%. The
UK's 2–10-year curve had flattened from about 35 bp in mid-January to less than
five basis points in mid-February. It made a marginal new high
(steepness) for the year of almost 40 bp before finishing last week below 15
bp.
The focus shifts to the
European Central Bank. It meets on March 10. Broadly speaking, we see
Russia's attack on Ukraine and the subsequent response as sharpening both
blades of a scissors. Growth will likely be weaker and inflation
stronger. Europe is the epicenter, and it complicates the ECB's
task. A shift in policy was not on the table for this meeting. The
focus is on the new economic forecasts and the adjustment to the forward
guidance on its asset purchases.
The forecasts are likely to
recognize the contradictory impulses. In December, the ECB's staff forecast 4.2% growth
this year, 2.9% next, and 1.6% in 2024. This year's growth prospects are
likely to be reduced but pushed into next year and maybe a bit into 2024.
ECB's Chief Economist Lane suggested that the rise in oil prices could shave
0.3%-0.4% off growth.
The ECB's inflation forecast
was more controversial.
It projected 3.2% CPI this year, which seems low, even before the war.
Investors learned last week that Eurozone inflation reached 5.6% in February,
bolstered by higher energy and food prices. The core rate ticked up to
2.6% from 2.3%. The ECB has forecast inflation falling to 1.8% in 2023
and 2024. This may adjust higher.
Some central bankers, like
the governor of Austria's central bank, seem to still be pushing against the
sequencing that ECB President Lagarde had outlined. The Pandemic Emergency
Purchase Program will end this month and to smooth out the transition the
pre-existing QE effort (Asset Purchase Program) would double to 40 bln euro a
month in Q2. She had been very clear that the bond buying would end a
little before the first hike. So, the forward guidance on the asset
purchases will reveal the beginning of the rate hike window.
If the ECB wants to have
flexibility to raise rates before the end of the year, it will likely have to
modify its guidance. It could do so by signaling that the APP will wind down in
Q3. Given the high degree of uncertainty right now, it might choose
instead to reaffirm its commitment to the APP purchases in Q2 and indicate Q3
is under review. The point is that the ECB will likely alter its outlook
for asset purchases in order to give itself the ability to begin adjusting
rates in Q4.
Ironically, as the ECB
secures this flexibility the market is moving in the other direction. Russia's war on Ukraine has seen the
aggressive tightening priced into G7 countries, excluding Japan, unwind considerably.
On the eve of the US warning of impending Russian invasion, the swaps market
was pricing in 50 bp of hikes in the second half of the year. Now it may
be pricing in around 20 basis points. The premium Italy pays to borrow
over Germany is an important market barometer of pressure in Europe
(fragmentation). That premium steadily increased from around 90 bp a year
ago to about 170 bp before Russia attacked. It finished last week a little above 160 bp.
In addition to the ECB
meeting, the US and China will report February CPI figures. US inflation likely
accelerated. It is partly food and energy, but not just that, and like we
have seen with the seasonal adjustment of nonfarm payrolls, the adjustment of
the CPI basket adds a new wrinkle. The median forecast in Bloomberg's
survey is for a 0.8% increase in the headline and 0.5% increase in the core
rate. Given the base effect, it translates to a 7.9% year-over-year rate
(from 7.5%) in the headline and 6.4% (from 6.0%) at the core. The year-over-year
comparison becomes a little easier starting this month's CPI. Recall that
in the March through June 2021, the monthly CPI rose by a cumulative
2.8%. Nevertheless, with the higher energy and food prices, it is
reasonable to suspect that inflation has not peaked. Also, the full impact of
rising house prices has yet to feed through to the CPI.
Chinese inflation is a
different story.
China was experiencing deflation in the first part of last year. In January and
February 2021, China's headline CPI was -0.3% and -0.2% year-over-year,
respectively. It proceeded to rise in the spring and fall, peaking in
November at 2.3%. However, it has fallen off sharply, and stood at 0.9%
in January. It may have slowed a little last month. Pork prices
continue to be a significant drag and the government has begun talking about
rebuilding inventories, which could support prices. Food prices were 3.8%
lower than a year ago in January. Excluding food and energy, China's core
CPI has been stable since last July 1.2%-1.3%. Weak domestic demand,
especially for services may be weighing on prices as well. Inflation may
be subdued for the next few months before accelerating later this year.
China's producer price index
is expected to have fallen for the fourth consecutive month in February. The year-over-year pace peaked last
October at 13.5%. It was at 9.1% in January. The median forecast in
Bloomberg's survey is for 8.6% in February, which would be the lowest since
last April. Although China has tapped some of its strategic reserves, the
price of various industrial commodities, including iron ore and coal have risen
and we suspect China's PPI may also begin rising again. Still, our skepticism
that China's PPI tells us anything about CPI in the US has indeed been borne
out by the data.
Lastly, we note that US will
report January's trade deficit while China reports the January-February's trade
surplus. The US
already reported a record goods deficit for January of $107.6 bln. Good
imports rose by 1.7% while exports fell by roughly the same percentage. The US
trade balance has deteriorated sharply. Consider that last year's goods
and services trade deficit averaged $71.6 bn a month. That is a nearly
50% (48%) increase from the two years before the pandemic (2018 and
2019).
China's trade report is more
difficult to read.
Due to the Lunar New Year holiday, the January and February trade balances will
be reported together. However, the underlying signal should not be lost in the
noise. China's monthly trade surplus was nearly CNY365 bln (~$56.4 bln)
in 2021, which nearly double the 2018 pace when it averaged almost CNY195 bln
(~$29.3 bln).
Chinese officials emphasize
the flexibility that has been introduced to the yuan. The yuan reached four-year highs
this past week, but it has appreciated less than 0.6% this year and that is
after appreciating 2.7% last year. The 6.7% it gained in 2020 merely
recouped its losses from 2018 and 2019. China has not provided enough flexibility
of the yuan to absorb the pressures coming from the trade surplus and the
portfolio capital inflows.
Meanwhile, hopes of interest
cuts have faded and China's 10-year yield edged higher in the first four sessions last week before slipping slightly ahead of the weekend. It had bottomed near 2.67% on
January 4 and retested the year's high near 2.85% last week. It settled near 2.82%, the highest weekly close of the year. As a
consequence of the decline in US yields and the rise in China's, it premium
over the US has begun widening again. It had fallen from around 150 bp in
mid-December to less than 80 bp by early February. It finished the week almost at 105 bp. However, the lowly GDP target set by the NPC of 5.5%, which seems optimistic, may require more monetary support.
(Due to travel plans, there will be no note tomorrow on the price action.)
Disclaimer
Reviewed by Marc Chandler
on
March 05, 2022
Rating:
